who is better? LIONS OR THE BENGALS?

Lions are a better "team," and I don't think the Bengals are getting any better. At least Detroit has some youth AND a RB on it's side...

If I had to pick which team will be on the winning track in the near future, I'd pick Detroit. They've got the RB, WR, and a couple of pieces on D. PLUS no OCHO CINCO and convicts.

Calvin Johnson might be the best play of the 2 teams....but Ill take the Bengals.....Palmer bein down hurt them alot. They have been closer to the playoffs(2 years ago). Better coaching..lions dont even have a coach. and 0-16 no one else ever did that. I dont see how you can pick the lions.

this is right now.... and im going to post some humiliating stats......
RANKS THROUGHOUT THE SEASON ON D
lions (first rank given) bengals (second)
OVERALL D (YARDS) 32 12
RUSHING D (YARDS) 32 21
PASSING D (Y.P.G) 27 15

PASSING YPG 24 30
RUSSING YARDS 30 29


AND THE BEST STAT FOR THOSE LION SUPPORTERS,
OVERALL O 30 32

AND ILL B A BITCH LIKE I AM AND I WILL PISS ALL OF YALL OFF.
BENGALS ARE RANKED 12 IN TURNOVER DIFF AT TURNOVER DIFF AT ONLY -2.

THE LIONS ARE SOOO BAD THAT THEY ARENT EVEN MENTIONED


here is were i got all of my info from http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statistics?sort=ypg&stat=team&pos=def&league=nfl&season=2&year=2008 i used the thing at the top to select areas. i was to lazy to post it all but u get my point[left][justify][center]

Please. In a bottom feeder tourney I'd take the Lions over the Chiefs, Seahawks, Rams, and the Bengals (even with a healthy Carson Palmer). The Browns would probably beat Detroit. Not all of the Lions pathetic games were blowout losses.

yeah, but think about this, u think the browns would beat u, we beat the browns easily. and we are in a div with the best two defenses in the league. we have 4 games vs #1 and #2. we also have housmanzadah or however u spell it. he is a lil worse than calvin, but not by much. and our backup qbs are better than urs. if ocho actualy trys then we have a better passing, and if our big guys played a bad team for once, (instead of facing the ravens dts, or pit, or shaun rodgers) we'd have an average oline. and our 3rd string gaurd is our starter due to injuries. we would stop any blitz the lions would throw at us (experience) and i bet that our D could handle the lions

<Korny

i voted for neither they both suck

ItalianMafia wrote: <Korny

lol, im not giving up, its hard to prove a team with more than 0 wins is better than 1 with none.
we better than u think, i have the facts, otherwise, look at the tape, or watch some more of the beatdown the lions got handed almost everygame. lol the lions are the worst team ive ever seen, and yet how are they better then the bengals. go figure. 0-16

don't talk about injuries. we limped through most of the season with injuries not to mention the ridiculous number of ppl that ended up on IR. i'll raise the white flag, too, if we're going to base everything off of stats. the lions had a horrible year, no doubt (the worst ever in fact). but i still think they'd own the bengals and they'd own them in cincinnati.

well we won our last three. u didnt
we have momentum and no doubt we would stop ur O cold
the question is, who is going to win between our O and ur D. both are pathetic
remember, we'd keep calvin out of the game. we can stop a 1 man O for sure